[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1036534 - /subversion/trunk/Makefile.in

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:51:33 +0000

Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:31:39 +0000:
>> > Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:37:21PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > >> I guess the python libraries really are more reliable in this case.
>> > >
>> > > Point being that we require python anyway to compile Subversion.
>> >
>> > Is that right? I thought it was possible to compile a tarball without
>> > using Python? If so it should be possible to build the Perl bindings on
>> > a platform that doesn't have Python.
>> >
>>
>> I had the same thought.
>
> Yes please. That reasoning makes sense.
> I didn't think of the compile-from-tarball case.

r1039040. The SWIG Perl bindings build on my Linux box.

-- 
Philip
Received on 2010-11-25 14:52:18 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.