[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1036534 - /subversion/trunk/Makefile.in

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:55:16 +0100

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:31:39 +0000:
> > Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:37:21PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > >> I guess the python libraries really are more reliable in this case.
> > >
> > > Point being that we require python anyway to compile Subversion.
> >
> > Is that right? I thought it was possible to compile a tarball without
> > using Python? If so it should be possible to build the Perl bindings on
> > a platform that doesn't have Python.
> >
>
> I had the same thought.

Yes please. That reasoning makes sense.
I didn't think of the compile-from-tarball case.
 
> > We can assume that anyone building the Perl bindings has Perl, so how
> > about using a perl version of the Python command:
> >
> > READLINK_PL=$(PERL) -e 'use Cwd; print Cwd::realpath($ARGV[0])'
>
> Need to double the second $ sign. (or s/$ARGV[0]/shift/)
Received on 2010-11-25 13:56:02 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.