On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:25:24 +0100:
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
>> <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> writes:
>> >> Or, maybe the best approach: I could add a regression test for these
>> >> issues, so we can all be sure that they are fixed (and remain fixed),
>> >> after which they can be marked as fixed.
>> > Yes, please. Are there any existing XFAIL tests that apply? They
>> > sometimes don't XPASS automatically when the bug is fixed because the
>> > test expectation is wrong.
>> Doh, it seems that issue #3474 already has a test, which PASSes (added
>> by Bert, which he mentioned in a comment in the issue):
>> PASS: copy_tests.py 81: copy of new dir with copied file keeps history
>> This is exactly what issue #3474 is about. Bert added the test as
>> XFAIL in r938071, and it was marked PASS by you, Philip, in r955334.
>> So, I guess this wraps up that issue: can someone mark it as resolved?
> Could you mark it as resolved? Or don't you have the necessary
> permissions on tigris?
Ok, done (didn't know I could do that myself :-)).
>> There was a slight confusion when I read the test code, because a
>> comment still talks about the tests as "Currently this fails because
>> ...". The following patch removes that obsolete comment:
>> Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py
>> --- subversion/tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py (revision 1035851)
>> +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/copy_tests.py (working copy)
>> @@ -4358,8 +4358,6 @@ def copy_added_dir_with_copy(sbox):
>> 'NewDir2/mu' : Item(status='A ', copied='+', wc_rev='-'),
>> - # Currently this fails because NewDir2/mu loses its history in the copy
>> - # from NewDir to NewDir2
>> svntest.actions.run_and_verify_status(wc_dir, expected_status)
> +1, but could you add a link to the issue (in a comment) while you're
Committed in r1036306.
Received on 2010-11-18 02:13:22 CET