Re: Upgrading partially relocated working copies

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:48:40 -0400

On 11/04/2010 07:23 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> I don't think it makes sense for upgrade to preserve the
> mixed-location-ness as the user could not use 1.7 to convert such a
> working copy to single-location. The only sensible options are either
> to detect the mixed-location-ness and abort the upgrade, or to ignore it
> and upgrade to single-location. We currently do the latter and if the
> location is wrong the user can use the relocate command after the
> upgrade to fix it.

RESOLVED/WORKSFORME

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on 2010-11-04 22:49:19 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Chris Tashjian: ""svn blame -g" causing svnserve to hang & mem usage to hit 2GB"
Previous message: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: svn commit: r1031114 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h"
In reply to: Philip Martin: "Re: Upgrading partially relocated working copies"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]