Dominique Leuenberger wrote on Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 14:48:20 +0200:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:19 +0100, Jon Foster wrote:
>
> > Better, but it'll still go wrong with Neon 0.40 or 1.00. I guess it
> > needs to be something like:
> >
> > if test -n ["`echo "$NEON_VERSION" | $EGREP
> > '^(([1-9][0-9]*)|(0\.(29|[3-9][0-9])))\.'`"] ; then
> >
> > ? That should match 0.29-0.99 and 1.0 or later. I'm assuming there
> > won't ever be a 0.100 release.
> >
>
> Right; the up to 0.39 check is a lazy copy paste from all the other
> check in neon.m4 :)
>
> The check which exists already for 0.28 is like this:
> if test -n ["`echo "$NEON_VERSION" | $EGREP '^0\.(2[8-9]|
> 3[0-9])\.'`"] ; then
> AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([SVN_NEON_0_28], [1],
> [Define to 1 if you have Neon 0.28 or
> later.])
> fi
>
>
> For me either way is fine: I can update the patch to also detect newer
> versions as suggest by you. Which in turn will still break all the other
> detections of SVN_NEON_0_28 and older. Or we keep them 'in sync'
> together and fix them all together at a later stage.
The latter please; when Neon 0.39 comes around we'll fix all checks at
the same time.
Received on 2010-09-29 12:43:55 CEST