Julian Foad writes:
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 10:25 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:12:14 +0530:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I sent a patch a while ago for svn_repos_parse_dumpstream3. While I
> > > wait for approval, this is an RFC patch describing my future plan once
> > > that patch gets approved. It can be described tersely as "While at it
> > > (adding the new callback), fix everything that's wrong with the
> > > struct".
> I have just read through Daniel's diff of this patch, and the change
> appears to be:
> Add a dumpstream_version_record() method.
> Add scratch pool arguments to all methods.
> Is that what you intended? If so, it sounds sane to me. (I would name
> the scratch pool arguments 'scratch_pool'.)
Yep, and I'm changing the API to pass the scratch pool around. I'm
using Git to stage all my changes and produce a coherent series with
relevant changes, but it's taking some time- expect to see a series
Received on 2010-08-23 18:28:44 CEST