On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:08 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 10:54 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>>> (A much older suggestion was moving the code into svnsync as they are
>>> related tools)
>> I think either that or folding it into svnadmin itself. But, we don't
>> need another tool program, IMO. -- justin
> I, too, was thinking about folding it into svnadmin. But svnadmin has
> always been a server-side tool (it knows nothing of URLs and authorization
> stuffs and ...) and I kinda think it would be really weird to change that.
> There's (in my mind, at least) a much tighter philosophical connection with
> svnsync anyway.
+1. The charter for svnadmin is currently, and should remain, solely
focused on local access to a repository.
Received on 2010-07-26 17:11:31 CEST