On Thu, 2010-07-01, Greg Stein wrote:
> Do we have tests for the upgrade process? For example, upgrading
> text-bases from a 1.0 working copy (no revert-base!), from 1.4 working
> copies when revert was introduced, etc. Tests for computing missing
> checksums?
Thanks to Bert, last night, yes we do.
Now enabling it ...
r959954: subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h: Enable the pristine text store: bump
the WC format to 17 and define SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE.
- Julian
> (that's the one thing stopping my in-db-props format bump)
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:23, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> > Any objections to enabling SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE and WC format = 17
> > in trunk tomorrow morning?
> >
> > Since r959358, builds with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE defined and WC
> > format bumped to 17 are passing all tests in the test suite and I have
> > been using such a build on one of my trunk WCs today.
> >
> > What's not there yet?
> >
> > - removing unreferenced pristines from the store
> >
> > That's the main thing. That means the pristine store directory (and DB
> > table) will grow with each "svn update". I think that's OK to work with
> > during development for a short while. I'm starting to write some
> > cleanup code now.
> >
> > I'm looking forward to removing a lot of cruft after we enable it.
> >
> > - Julian
> >
> >
> >
Received on 2010-07-02 13:33:17 CEST