Do we have tests for the upgrade process? For example, upgrading
text-bases from a 1.0 working copy (no revert-base!), from 1.4 working
copies when revert was introduced, etc. Tests for computing missing
checksums?
(that's the one thing stopping my in-db-props format bump)
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:23, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Any objections to enabling SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE and WC format = 17
> in trunk tomorrow morning?
>
> Since r959358, builds with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE defined and WC
> format bumped to 17 are passing all tests in the test suite and I have
> been using such a build on one of my trunk WCs today.
>
> What's not there yet?
>
> - removing unreferenced pristines from the store
>
> That's the main thing. That means the pristine store directory (and DB
> table) will grow with each "svn update". I think that's OK to work with
> during development for a short while. I'm starting to write some
> cleanup code now.
>
> I'm looking forward to removing a lot of cruft after we enable it.
>
> - Julian
>
>
>
Received on 2010-07-01 22:56:12 CEST