[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index


From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:54:33 -0400

Do we have tests for the upgrade process? For example, upgrading
text-bases from a 1.0 working copy (no revert-base!), from 1.4 working
copies when revert was introduced, etc. Tests for computing missing

(that's the one thing stopping my in-db-props format bump)

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:23, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Any objections to enabling SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE and WC format = 17
> in trunk tomorrow morning?
> Since r959358, builds with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE defined and WC
> format bumped to 17 are passing all tests in the test suite and I have
> been using such a build on one of my trunk WCs today.
> What's not there yet?
>  - removing unreferenced pristines from the store
> That's the main thing.  That means the pristine store directory (and DB
> table) will grow with each "svn update".  I think that's OK to work with
> during development for a short while.  I'm starting to write some
> cleanup code now.
> I'm looking forward to removing a lot of cruft after we enable it.
> - Julian
Received on 2010-07-01 22:56:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.