[resending; the original has httpd.apache.COM ...]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 15:12, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:20, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> "Bert Huijben" <bert_at_qqmail.nl> writes:
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: szukw000_at_arcor.de [mailto:szukw000_at_arcor.de]
>>>> Sent: maandag 28 juni 2010 9:51
>>>> To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: subversion-1.6.12, apache-2.3.6
>>>>
>>>> I know that httpd-2.3.x is alpha. Second trial for the patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patch, it came through this time.
>>> To apply the patch to trunk we need code that works on older and newer
>>> versions of httpd (E.g. including proper checking for which version is being
>>> used).
>>>
>>> I assume you know more about how we should check for specific httpd
>>> versions than we do as you are testing httpd alpha's.
>>
>> I think there is an apache bug here. This is the revision that
>> changed the dav_new_error API (in mod_dav.h):
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=882274
>>
>> It includes a change to ap_mmn.h, but that change only modifies the
>> comments, it doesn't change MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR. Thus callers
>> cannot determine which version of the API to use.
>
> Yup... along with making other changes to keep up with further MMN
> bumps since then. (eg. the AP_LOG_MARK change that OP mentioned)
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
Received on 2010-06-28 21:14:22 CEST