Re: Antwort: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cache for fsfs

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:41:33 -0400

On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:29 -0400, michael.felke_at_evonik.com wrote:
> We must ensure that the data in the repository is, without any concerns,
> the data we have once measured or written.

You do realize that the probability of data corruption due to faulty
hardware is much, much more likely than the probability of corruption
due to a rep-sharing SHA-1 collision, right?
Received on 2010-06-24 18:42:20 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bert Huijben: "RE: svn commit: r957608 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client: info.c status.c"
Previous message: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: svn commit: r957094 - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/include/ subversion/libsvn_client/ subversion/libsvn_fs*/ subversion/libsvn_ra*/ ..."
In reply to: michael.felke_at_evonik.com: "Antwort: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cache for fsfs"
Next in thread: michael.felke_at_evonik.com: "Antwort: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cache for fsfs"
Reply: michael.felke_at_evonik.com: "Antwort: Re: dangerous implementation of rep-sharing cache for fsfs"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]