[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: status information

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:17:10 -0400

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 13:58, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Greg:  See above.  We've plenty of WC-NG plumbing to deal with before ever
> needing to engage the topic of "which of a handful of call and response
> paradigms will do the job and make us happiest".  Can we defer that decision
> until later?  Maybe a more mature WC-NG will help us to make better such
> decisions.

That's why I didn't engage in the first place. I didn't like it, and
didn't feel a need to respond *now*. Stefan pushed on it, so I
responded with my thoughts.


It's why I got so frustrated and slashed back so hard last night. I
think it is wrong to focus on performance problems and APIs today.
You're right: there is a ton to do. We know that, and we have plans
for the next N steps already. Until we complete those plans, then the
rest is moot. And *pushing* on us before we complete those plans is
annoying, to say the least.

Let us complete what we know is necessary, and THEN get a good look at
what is left to enable clients to function as efficiently as we
believe they can.

Received on 2010-06-18 23:17:48 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.