[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: status information

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:35:43 -0400

Stefan Küng wrote:
> So for me, 1.7 doesn't look like an improvement at all, no matter how
> great WC-NG will get. There aren't any new features in it (yet) which I
> haven't already used in 1.6, but I have to drop more and more existing
> features.
> And from your comments I get the impression that it will get worse (for
> me and TSVN) as time goes by.

Let's put an end to this right now, shall we?

TortoiseSVN has been and continues to be a significant source of the
overwhelming success that Subversion enjoys today, and I don't see that
changing unless that change is forced. It would be incredibly foolish for
this community to make API changes that serve only to lessen TortoiseSVN's
ability to remain a viable Subversion client on a critical platform.

There is a solution to be found here. We will find it, and we will find it
regardless of silly nuances and arbitrarily nods toward "the way we've
always done it". If that way isn't the way of sane progress, it's the wrong
route for this project.

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2010-06-17 22:36:27 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.