[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: status information

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:53:11 -0500

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:35 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Stefan Küng wrote:
>> So for me, 1.7 doesn't look like an improvement at all, no matter how
>> great WC-NG will get. There aren't any new features in it (yet) which I
>> haven't already used in 1.6, but I have to drop more and more existing
>> features.
>> And from your comments I get the impression that it will get worse (for
>> me and TSVN) as time goes by.
> Let's put an end to this right now, shall we?
> TortoiseSVN has been and continues to be a significant source of the
> overwhelming success that Subversion enjoys today, and I don't see that
> changing unless that change is forced.  It would be incredibly foolish for
> this community to make API changes that serve only to lessen TortoiseSVN's
> ability to remain a viable Subversion client on a critical platform.
> There is a solution to be found here.  We will find it, and we will find it
> regardless of silly nuances and arbitrarily nods toward "the way we've
> always done it".  If that way isn't the way of sane progress, it's the wrong
> route for this project.

Received on 2010-06-17 23:53:51 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.