[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn commit: r920424 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_wc/lock.c libsvn_wc/util.c libsvn_wc/wc.h

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_vmoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 23:56:31 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.martin_at_wandisco.com]
> Sent: woensdag 2 juni 2010 23:45
> To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r920424 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_wc/lock.c libsvn_wc/util.c
> libsvn_wc/wc.h
>
> Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
> > This implies that a disjoint child is equivalent to a switched child,
> > but despite child_is_disjoint's lack of documentation, it seems clear
> > that a child can be disjoint but not switched. Am I missing something
> > here?
>
> I think you are correct. Perhaps child_is_disjoint could set a switched
flag as
> well as a disjoint flag? SVN_ERR_WC_NOT_DIRECTORY is deprecated, it
> should be changed to SVN_ERR_WC_NOT_WORKING_COPY.

I think we have some _wc_is_root function that performs all these checks,
but (without looking at the code) I'm not sure if it correctly checks all
kinds of sub working copy obstructions I described in my previous mail
correctly.

        Bert
>
> --
> Philip
Received on 2010-06-02 23:58:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.