Re: WC-NG: Perhaps it's time to write a new summary of where we stand at the moment?

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:33, Daniel Näslund <daniel_at_longitudo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Greg [1] identified the following items in the beginning of February.
> >
> > * remove entry_t usage within libsvn_wc/client
>
> This is very close in the client, but there is still a good chunk of
> work in libsvn_wc.
>
> > * remove access_t usage withing libsvn_wc/client
>
> This looks to be done. libsvn_client has no more uses/references.
> There are still some references in libsvn_wc, but that appears to be
> for backwards compatibility only.
>
> Hyrum was doing some work to clarify access_t uses in libsvn_wc. Not
> sure where he is with that.
>

I started working in it, then spent a week at a conference, and then had my
laptop motherboard get toasted. I'm hoping to have the hardware back by
week's end, and then dive back in next week.

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-05-12 19:31:25 CEST