Re: WC-NG: Perhaps it's time to write a new summary of where we stand at the moment?
From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:14:13 -0400
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:33, Daniel Näslund <daniel_at_longitudo.com> wrote:
This is very close in the client, but there is still a good chunk of
> * remove access_t usage withing libsvn_wc/client
This looks to be done. libsvn_client has no more uses/references.
Hyrum was doing some work to clarify access_t uses in libsvn_wc. Not
> * move props into wc.db
Should happen within a week.
> * move to single/root wc.db
No plans yet. We probably need to remove entry_t uses before tackling this.
> * switch to new pristine file mgmt
Julian is working on this. I believe it is getting close for new
> I have the feeling, we've made some progress. Are there any new
We have work items which perform database work inside *and* perform
There are a number of places where we perform several db operations
> The WC-NG meta issue  contains only one dependency, #3586. Perhaps we
Meh. I don't use the tracker as a to-do list. The set of work is too
It's always fine!
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.