Re: [Issue 3596] 'hotcopy' of packed fsfs repos may corrupt target revprops.db

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:01:48 +0300 (Jerusalem Daylight Time)

Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, 16 Apr 2010 at 00:52 +0300:
> (probably need some coffee)

Indeed. The other two svn_fs_fs__* functions in rep-cache.c still check
rep_cache_db (not rep_cache_db_opened). Which makes me wonder if there's
still a race condition there or not.

It's too late now. I'll think of this in the morning!
Received on 2010-04-16 01:01:30 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stefan Fuhrmann: "Re: [PATCH] Fix O(n) runtime in cache lookup, part 1/2"
Previous message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Patch branch"
In reply to: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [Issue 3596] 'hotcopy' of packed fsfs repos may corrupt target revprops.db"
Next in thread: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [Issue 3596] 'hotcopy' of packed fsfs repos may corrupt target revprops.db"
Reply: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [Issue 3596] 'hotcopy' of packed fsfs repos may corrupt target revprops.db"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]