Re: wc-ng base/working nodes in a copied tree

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 05:53, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Okay. So I guess we continue to mark that as sched-delete.
>
> sched-delete is what we can do in 1.6, but it's not perfect.  This is
> not a normal delete by the user it's more of an internal Subversion
> delete.  One of the big differences is that the user cannot revert the
> delete, because the information about the node is not available.
> wc-ng could distinguish this from a normal delete.

We could distinguish it in some way, yes. At a minimum, we can mark
the node excluded when the user reverts the "deletion". (today, 1.6
fails, as I recall)

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-04-08 19:58:14 CEST