[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.10 up for testing/signing

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:45:15 -0500

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Hyrum K. Wright <
hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
>> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <
>> > hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659:
>> >>
>> >> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/
>> >>
>> >> Download, test, sign and send your sigs back to me. (And don't even
>> think
>> >> about declaring this as "released" until I say so, for reasons I won't
>> >> expound upon here.)
>> >>
>> >
>> > Update: Somebody (read: me) didn't run the bindings tests before rolling
>> the
>> > tarball. There are a few binding test failures, one in the ruby
>> bindings,
>> > another couple in the JavaHL tests. We're investigating those (and help
>> is
>> > of course appreciated), but the upshot is: there may be a 1.6.11
>> shortly.
>> >
>> > -Hyrum
>> >
>>
>> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-03/0593.shtml
>>
>
> Joe,
> Thanks for the reminder. Merging the changed suggested here (r876245) does
> indeed fix the test failure for me.
>

Joe,
I'm happy to +0 this patch, since it fixes the failure for me. I've no idea
what it's doing under the hood, though, so I'd feel more comfortable if you
were able to +1 it.

Thanks,
-Hyrum
Received on 2010-04-05 15:45:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.