[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Experiences of a Subversion FS backend developer

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:04:24 -0400

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 15:48, Jon Trowbridge <trow_at_google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke_at_gmx.de> wrote:
>> That doesn't make WebDAV a bad protocol, but it might make this *specific*
>> use of WebDAV a sub-optimal choice for the specific server platform.
>
> Given the large number of round-trips required to do anything, I'm
> perfectly comfortable calling WebDAV a bad protocol.  YMMV,
> particularly if you don't care about latency or you assume that the
> client and server are always on the same LAN.

That was our use of DeltaV, which has been ripped out in 1.7. (well...
newer hotness, and some back-compat remaining)

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-04-01 22:04:53 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.