On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 15:48, Jon Trowbridge <trow_at_google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke_at_gmx.de> wrote:
>> That doesn't make WebDAV a bad protocol, but it might make this *specific*
>> use of WebDAV a sub-optimal choice for the specific server platform.
> Given the large number of round-trips required to do anything, I'm
> perfectly comfortable calling WebDAV a bad protocol. YMMV,
> particularly if you don't care about latency or you assume that the
> client and server are always on the same LAN.
That was our use of DeltaV, which has been ripped out in 1.7. (well...
newer hotness, and some back-compat remaining)
Received on 2010-04-01 22:04:53 CEST