On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:01 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> > 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/
>>>>
>>>> For me, merge_tests.py 45 77 79 124 126 all fail, on serf/fsfs.
>>>
>>> If I roll the 1.6.x branch back to r929629, it passes.
>>
>> Hi Julian,
>>
>> Doesn't really help you, but those all pass for me:
>>
>> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\Release\subversion\tests\cmdline>python
>> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\subversion\tests\cmdline\merge_tests.py 45 77
>> 79 124 126 --http-library serf --cleanup
>> PASS: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor
>> PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok
>> PASS: merge_tests.py 79: merge --reintegrate with renamed file on branch
>> PASS: merge_tests.py 124: no self referential filtering on added path
>> PASS: merge_tests.py 126: merge --reintegrate with subtree mergeinfo
>
> My bad, I didn't pass --url! I was still half asleep when I did that.
> The tests pass for me over ra_neon, but all except 77 fail over
> ra_serf.
All 5 corresponding tests (45, 76, 78, 123, 125 for those playing at
home) pass on trunk [fsfs | ra_serf]
Paul
Received on 2010-04-01 15:11:11 CEST