[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.10 up for testing/signing - merge tests failing

From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:52:44 -0400

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:01 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> > 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659:
>>> >
>>> > http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/
>>>
>>> For me, merge_tests.py 45 77 79 124 126 all fail, on serf/fsfs.
>>
>> If I roll the 1.6.x branch back to r929629, it passes.
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> Doesn't really help you, but those all pass for me:
>
> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\Release\subversion\tests\cmdline>python
> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\subversion\tests\cmdline\merge_tests.py 45 77
> 79 124 126 --http-library serf --cleanup
> PASS:  merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor
> PASS:  merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok
> PASS:  merge_tests.py 79: merge --reintegrate with renamed file on branch
> PASS:  merge_tests.py 124: no self referential filtering on added path
> PASS:  merge_tests.py 126: merge --reintegrate with subtree mergeinfo

My bad, I didn't pass --url! I was still half asleep when I did that.
 The tests pass for me over ra_neon, but all except 77 fail over
ra_serf.

Paul
Received on 2010-04-01 15:02:17 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.