Re: svn commit: r917950 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c
Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:
> Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:46:47AM -0000, philip_at_apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: philip
>>> Date: Tue Mar 2 10:46:46 2010
>>> New Revision: 917950
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917950&view=rev
>>> * subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c (log_find_operative_revs): Use %ld
>>> rather than %d to format svn_revnum_t.
>> What about using this?
>> subversion/include/svn_types.h:#define SVN_REVNUM_T_FMT "ld"
> /** Originally intended to be used in printf()-style functions to format
> * revision numbers. Deprecated due to incompatibilities with language
> * translation tools (e.g. gettext).
> * New code should use a bare "%ld" format specifier for formatting revision
> * numbers.
> * @deprecated Provided for backward compatibility with the 1.0 API.
Perhaps that doesn't apply in this case? Is this string translated?
If it's valid to use it then we should update the svn_types.h to not
Received on 2010-03-02 12:43:04 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev