Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>>
>>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>>> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote:
>>>>> Status: New
>>>>> Owner: ----
>>>>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
>>>>>
>>>>> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!?
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/svnhelp/issues/detail?id=1
>>>> Uh ... we have yet another community to monitor? When did this 'svnhelp'
>>>> project come about?
>>> Hmm, looks to me like svnhelp should be disintegrated, no offense, Greg. It
>>> is out of date: "Right now, the working copy is at format 12" and I humbly
>>> expect that it won't be updated anytime soon.
>>>
>>> It is a tempting thought to manage our notes in a wiki rather than in
>>> $svnrepos/trunk/notes. But is it worth the trouble? I'm -0.5.
>> Agreed. Folks can put content where they will, but spamming the issues mailing list should only be done by "approved" sources.
>
> I call bullshit. At any point, I can compose a new message and send it
> to issues@. So what if "I" send one thru automated mechanisms?
>
> -g
Counter bullshit. It's a service for the masses to automatically send
messages to issues@, who should probably rather contact users@ in person. A
fan is approaching...
But you said it's going away anyway. No need to plaster each other ;)
~Neels
Received on 2010-02-19 23:54:10 CET