On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright
> On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote:
>>>> Status: New
>>>> Owner: ----
>>>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
>>>> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!?
>>> Uh ... we have yet another community to monitor? When did this 'svnhelp'
>>> project come about?
>> Hmm, looks to me like svnhelp should be disintegrated, no offense, Greg. It
>> is out of date: "Right now, the working copy is at format 12" and I humbly
>> expect that it won't be updated anytime soon.
>> It is a tempting thought to manage our notes in a wiki rather than in
>> $svnrepos/trunk/notes. But is it worth the trouble? I'm -0.5.
> Agreed. Folks can put content where they will, but spamming the issues mailing list should only be done by "approved" sources.
I call bullshit. At any point, I can compose a new message and send it
to issues@. So what if "I" send one thru automated mechanisms?
Received on 2010-02-19 20:27:27 CET