On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 21:34, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 13:01, Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_vmoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Should we hold the graduation process on the javahl api changes, or can we
>>>> just continue that?
>>>>
>>>> I would guess that we should have it fixed before release, but that it
>>>> doesn't hold the graduation...?
>>>
>>> I do not see a need to hold graduation until this is fixed in trunk
>>> (or a release).
>>>
>>> As Greg has pointed out before, the key bit - from the Incubator and
>>> Board levels - is that there is appropriate oversight being performed
>>> by the appropriate people. With those hats on, I'm very very
>>> comfortable that is the case. -- justin
>>
>> Agreed. We know the issue, and we will get it closed out before
>> release. As you point out, we have demonstrated appropriate oversight
>> and responsibility, just like any other Apache project, to get issues
>> like this handled.
>>
>> I need to update the podling's status page, and then I'll call for a
>> vote on general_at_incubator.
>
> Greg,
> Did you have an idea of when you were planning on starting this discussion / vote? (I assume you can still get bits in and out of northern Virginia... :P )
I was hoping to do it tomorrow. Before calling the vote, I want to
update the incubator status page. Then start the vote.
Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-02-10 03:49:27 CET