On Feb 2, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 13:01, Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_vmoo.com> wrote:
>>> Should we hold the graduation process on the javahl api changes, or can we
>>> just continue that?
>>> I would guess that we should have it fixed before release, but that it
>>> doesn't hold the graduation...?
>> I do not see a need to hold graduation until this is fixed in trunk
>> (or a release).
>> As Greg has pointed out before, the key bit - from the Incubator and
>> Board levels - is that there is appropriate oversight being performed
>> by the appropriate people. With those hats on, I'm very very
>> comfortable that is the case. -- justin
> Agreed. We know the issue, and we will get it closed out before
> release. As you point out, we have demonstrated appropriate oversight
> and responsibility, just like any other Apache project, to get issues
> like this handled.
> I need to update the podling's status page, and then I'll call for a
> vote on general_at_incubator.
Did you have an idea of when you were planning on starting this discussion / vote? (I assume you can still get bits in and out of northern Virginia... :P )
Received on 2010-02-10 03:34:51 CET