Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:19 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> In my head, it wasn't a reversion -- it was a revision. I honestly thought
>> that you'd be okay with the change, having taken this statement:
> I think if you place yourself in my shoes, I think perhaps you'd
> understand why I view it as a "reversion". I made the change, you
> said, "please revert", we start to discuss, and in the middle of the
> discussion, you just revert the change anyway.
> At the least, I think it would have been appropriate for you to
> suggest the change and then I could have said "Sure, that's fine - go
> ahead and commit." It wasn't like I wasn't trying to engage in a
> dialogue to see what would be better. Instead, I feel that you just
> did what you wanted to do and didn't really listen to me at all.
> Maybe I'm dead wrong, but that's certainly how I feel at the moment. -- justin
Life is like a version control system with no obliterate feature. Change
comes only via the addition of new revisions. So what can I do to make you
less unhappy in HEAD?
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2010-02-03 18:56:06 CET