Re: svn commit: r905916 - /subversion/site/publish/site-nav.html

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:19 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> In my head, it wasn't a reversion -- it was a revision.  I honestly thought
> that you'd be okay with the change, having taken this statement:

I think if you place yourself in my shoes, I think perhaps you'd
understand why I view it as a "reversion". I made the change, you
said, "please revert", we start to discuss, and in the middle of the
discussion, you just revert the change anyway.

At the least, I think it would have been appropriate for you to
suggest the change and then I could have said "Sure, that's fine - go
ahead and commit." It wasn't like I wasn't trying to engage in a
dialogue to see what would be better. Instead, I feel that you just
did what you wanted to do and didn't really listen to me at all.

Maybe I'm dead wrong, but that's certainly how I feel at the moment. -- justin
Received on 2010-02-03 18:37:19 CET