[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: two questions (and a proposed patch) regarding svn:ignore

From: Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:25:45 +0000

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:20 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 06:46:46PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > I like this change for my uses of 'svn' as '*' is handled by the
> > shell, but I don't think the new functionality is logical at the
> > svn_client_add() layer. In most gui clients I use, I see some svn
> > status output containing the not added files and then these clients
> > allow adding all or some of the files via the explicit variant.
> >
> > Just notifying that you skipped a few files that would have been added
> > before, would make it very hard for api users to replicate the old
> > behavior via the new api. (Using the notify handler to check for error
> > conditions is not so easy for most api users)
> Right now, the no_ignore parameter only disables global ignores,
> and svn:ignore ignores are always ignored.

No, that's not right. I just tried it with a trunk build. I set
'svn:ignore' to ignore the file named 'F', and then I try an 'svn add
--force' that encounters a file named 'F', without and then with

$ svn mkdir --parents a/b/c
A a
A a/b
A a/b/c

$ echo hello > a/F

$ echo hello > a/b/G

$ svn ps svn:ignore F a a/b a/b/c
property 'svn:ignore' set on 'a'
property 'svn:ignore' set on 'a/b'
property 'svn:ignore' set on 'a/b/c'

$ svn add --force a
A a/b/G

$ svn add --force a

$ svn add --force --no-ignore a
A a/F

So it looks like your new "no_svn_ignores" parameter is not needed.

If you find it does what you said in a different scenario (e.g. if the
svn:ignore property is committed versus uncommitted) then clearly that
would be a bug.

- Julian
Received on 2010-02-03 01:26:25 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.