Re: TODO: Python bindings re-license

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:08 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> 2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>:
>>>> òÏÍÁÎ äÏÎÞÅÎËÏ wrote:
>>>>> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> ÐÉÓÁÌ × Ó×Ï£Í ÐÉÓØÍÅ Tue, 19 Jan
>>>>> 2010 17:57:17 +0300:
>>>>>> I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
>>>>>> bindings *tests*. šBut unless I'm mistaken, there's no reason for the
>>>>>> bindings themselves to carry additional copyright and license
>>>>>> baggage. šIf
>>>>>> that's the case, I hereby request that we drop said baggage immediately.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, we can't drop it entirely, we should just move into a more
>>>>> appropriate place (i.e. the tests/trac directory) and clarify which code
>>>>> it applies to.
>>>> Yes. šIt should be LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS_TEST_SUITE, not
>>>> LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS (which should have exactly the same license as
>>>> the rest of Subversion).
>>> Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely
>>> and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root?
>>
>> That's even better!
>
> Is there an example of this readily available. šI'm pouring over
> http://www.apache.org/legal/ and http://www.apache.org/licenses/ without
> success here.

Yep.

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/