[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: TODO: Python bindings re-license

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:08:41 -0500

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> 2010/1/19 C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>:
>>> Роман Донченко wrote:
>>>> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> писал в своём письме Tue, 19 Jan
>>>> 2010 17:57:17 +0300:
>>>>> I'd be lying if I said I cared a lick about the licensing of our Python
>>>>> bindings *tests*. But unless I'm mistaken, there's no reason for the
>>>>> bindings themselves to carry additional copyright and license
>>>>> baggage. If
>>>>> that's the case, I hereby request that we drop said baggage immediately.
>>>>>
>>>> Well, we can't drop it entirely, we should just move into a more
>>>> appropriate place (i.e. the tests/trac directory) and clarify which code
>>>> it applies to.
>>> Yes. It should be LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS_TEST_SUITE, not
>>> LICENSE_FOR_PYTHON_BINDINGS (which should have exactly the same license as
>>> the rest of Subversion).
>> Under the ASF system I thought we could potentially drop this entirely
>> and add something to NOTICE and LICENSE in root?
>
> That's even better!

Is there an example of this readily available. I'm pouring over
http://www.apache.org/legal/ and http://www.apache.org/licenses/ without
success here.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2010-01-29 17:09:19 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.