Kannan wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > The notification "Merging ... r891676 through ..." doesn't match the
> > actual recorded svn:mergeinfo "r891677-...".
> [..]
> > Is that difference in the start revision of the range expected? (The
> > merge saying it's recording "r891676 through ..." versus diff showing
> > that ":r891677-..." was recorded. And a propget confirms the diff.)
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> Yes, as stated in [1] start revision of the revision range of a merge is
> meant inclusive( from what we get in `svn pget').
>
> [1]- http://www.collab.net/community/subversion/articles/merge-info.html
Yes, but the notification message "Merging r891676 through r902803" also
sounds like it is inclusive. It's one of those cases where it isn't
clear what we mean by a "revision": do we mean a change or a version?
When I read it this time I thought it meant the change number 891676 but
in fact it means the version number 891676.
Never mind, it's not really a problem.
- Julian
Received on 2010-01-25 15:54:48 CET