[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn merge - start revision off by one, and repeat merge is not a no-op

From: Kannan <kannanr_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:04:53 +0530

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Julian Foad wrote:
> The notification "Merging ... r891676 through ..." doesn't match the
> actual recorded svn:mergeinfo "r891677-...".
[..]
> Is that difference in the start revision of the range expected? (The
> merge saying it's recording "r891676 through ..." versus diff showing
> that ":r891677-..." was recorded. And a propget confirms the diff.)

Hi Julian,

Yes, as stated in [1] start revision of the revision range of a merge is
meant inclusive( from what we get in `svn pget').

[1]- http://www.collab.net/community/subversion/articles/merge-info.html

- --
Thanks & Regards,
Kannan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEVAwUBS12sDXlTqcY7ytmIAQLcqQf/Zppqv8f4fEge9dumi5T1yGCtnI4h6mUt
Zs8DMJX2VDnVOtUmBImReR12v5F49gGiDb39R7MBS1G0OJOQmwUosADHyr61DKu1
L+ty9KD0uDP+XeMRdm5uPD9JSWCNNV0O3B7ZGynqCIi7upCbj12SHhkTzoL36Rka
/HbwpP85/qKbvQou9NPGpvbtVVkEE0VPpgeoeyM/L3Fqe3rlrqoMGOJDJhFAqB14
g6JYL0GNO4g+spAlXhh3cqbqqf0v9pd/lQm1wHWvzrCjOMHZ7fFFnPb8dQ/kNXsQ
yna+bI1rKQg4DJxvl6KxMOch3wnKTCgpuNsTVJWR/CP+b3aKHtvL2g==
=nd+8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on 2010-01-25 15:44:06 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.