Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:23 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> Has anyone besides Hyrum, Mark P. and myself taken a look at the new website
>> from a layout perspective? What stands between us and the day when we
>> remove that yellow banner and "commit to" this thing?
> The general layout looks good and clean to me. One remark: I'm not a
> layout/color specialist, but I wonder if the pages won't lack a bit of
> color when the bright yellow block is removed.
Yeah, that's fair. I'm primarily interested in content feedback at the
moment, but I;ll toss a little color onto the sidebar.
> Can we please add the link to the issue tracker again in the menu? I'm
> not talking about "report a new bug", but 'look at the existing
> already reported bugs and feature requests". Something that makes it
> easy for me to type in the word "serf"' and get all the serf related
> open reports would serve my needs perfectly. :)
It's really all about you, Lieven. :-) But yeah, we need to have a link to
a bug tracker landing page on the left-nav, to be sure. I'll add something
> Some details:
> On the getting.html page: DJ has announced he stops building the
> windows binaries so he should be removed from the package maintainers
getting.html is a mess. I'd love to hear Hyrum's thoughts about it, because
they will almost certainly be an improvement.
> The roadmap table is outdated. In fact, do we really plan to keep this
> page up to date during the release process?
I do believe there's value in revealing where the project is going in a
format that's more user-friendly than, say, a pointer to a bunch of issue
tracker items. But yes, we need to seriously revamp this page, removing all
the vastly speculative material and focusing on what we know.
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2010-01-22 17:10:18 CET