On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markphip_at_gmail.com]
>>> Sent: woensdag 13 januari 2010 15:53
>>> To: Hyrum K. Wright
>>> Cc: Joe Swatosh; Subversion Dev
>>> Subject: Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing
>>>
>>> I think the problem is with Neon. We get this error:
>>>
>>> Linking...
>>> Creating library
>>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.lib and object
>>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.exp
>>> libneon.lib(ne_socket.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
>>> _inet_aton referenced in function _ne_iaddr_parse
>>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.dll : fatal error
>>> LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
>>>
>>> You are including 0.29.0 When I step it back to 0.28.3 it works.
>>
>> Not really about this issue as I can't reproduce that here, but:
>>
>> Neon versions 0.29.0-0.29.2 have a regression in connecting to several https
>> servers. On sites that run a proxy or a non-apache subversion host (E.g.
>> codeplex) you can see timeouts on connection close time.
>>
>> I would recommend sticking with 0.28.x or using 0.29.3 (Released last
>> Monday) for binary releases.
>
> Given this feedback, and the fact that it's a patch release with supposed minimal changes between releases, I agree we should step back to Neon 0.28.3. I've rerolled the tarballs and replaced them at the download site with the new deps tarballs.
>
> Note: All the tarballs have been recreated, as have the signatures. You'll need to sign the new 1.6.8 tarballs, not the old ones.
>
> This is turning into quite the star-crossed release. Thanks for the patience.
>
The deps .zip and .bz2 and .gz seem to still have neon 0.29.0....
--
Joe
Received on 2010-01-14 07:16:58 CET