[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[NEW TARBALLS] Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:19:57 -0600

On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markphip_at_gmail.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 13 januari 2010 15:53
>> To: Hyrum K. Wright
>> Cc: Joe Swatosh; Subversion Dev
>> Subject: Re: 1.6.8 up for signing / testing
>> I think the problem is with Neon. We get this error:
>> Linking...
>> Creating library
>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.lib and object
>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.exp
>> libneon.lib(ne_socket.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
>> _inet_aton referenced in function _ne_iaddr_parse
>> ..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.dll : fatal error
>> LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
>> You are including 0.29.0 When I step it back to 0.28.3 it works.
> Not really about this issue as I can't reproduce that here, but:
> Neon versions 0.29.0-0.29.2 have a regression in connecting to several https
> servers. On sites that run a proxy or a non-apache subversion host (E.g.
> codeplex) you can see timeouts on connection close time.
> I would recommend sticking with 0.28.x or using 0.29.3 (Released last
> Monday) for binary releases.

Given this feedback, and the fact that it's a patch release with supposed minimal changes between releases, I agree we should step back to Neon 0.28.3. I've rerolled the tarballs and replaced them at the download site with the new deps tarballs.

Note: All the tarballs have been recreated, as have the signatures. You'll need to sign the new 1.6.8 tarballs, not the old ones.

This is turning into quite the star-crossed release. Thanks for the patience.

Received on 2010-01-13 17:20:38 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.