[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever.FTA_at_GMail.Com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:37:21 +0100

2009-11-09 16:10:06 Greg Stein napisaƂ(a):
> Hi all,
>
> Now that we're in the Incubator and on our way to becoming an Apache
> project, one of the items that we need to select is which bug tracker
> to use.
>
> I'll preface this with: the ASF does not *mandate* that we use its
> facilities for bug tracking. It only wants source control and the
> original distribution point to be on ASF hardware. I'm not necessarily
> advocating that we keep a separate tracker (user confusion), but it is
> possible. Weigh the pros/cons in your mind.
>
> The ASF provides two bug trackers:
>
> 1) Jira at http://issues.apache.org/jira/

-1

> 2) Bugzilla at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

+1

> In our discussion with the ASF Infrastructure Team, they have no
> preference on which we choose. Both are equally supported.
>
> For completeness:
>
> 3) Stick to Issuezilla on tigris.org

-0

> 4) Use the issue tracker on Google Code in <some> appropriate project.
> [this is my favorite tracker!]

-1

> 5) Set up our own tracker on ASF hardware (eg. Trac). [I do not
> recommend this; our project would have to maintain it; ASF Infra only
> maintains Jira/Bugzilla]

-1

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2417419

Received on 2009-11-13 06:34:54 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.