[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:57:14 -0500

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Now that we're in the Incubator and on our way to becoming an Apache
> project, one of the items that we need to select is which bug tracker
> to use.
>
> I'll preface this with: the ASF does not *mandate* that we use its
> facilities for bug tracking. It only wants source control and the
> original distribution point to be on ASF hardware. I'm not necessarily
> advocating that we keep a separate tracker (user confusion), but it is
> possible. Weigh the pros/cons in your mind.
>
> The ASF provides two bug trackers:
>
> 1) Jira at http://issues.apache.org/jira/
>
> 2) Bugzilla at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

The GoogleCode option is kind of interesting, but it does not feel
right for some reason to have our issue tracker not on Apache.

My vote would be for Bugzilla. It is open-source (which ought to be
important to all of us), and obviously it is similar to IssueZilla.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415822
Received on 2009-11-09 16:57:25 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.