On Nov 6, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> [Sorry for brevity; phone]
>
> We're not ready for an alpha, but we could do an "internal"
> experimental
> release. I seem to recall seeing that in the docs.
+1
As I thought I said earlier, *any* release that has proper Apache
packaging, licensing, and notices is fine with me. We've had this
discussion in the incubator before, for similar reasons, and I think
there is consensus that a formal review of a podling release is a
reasonable gate for graduation. No one needs to believe that the
release is stable, tested, reliable, etc.; it just needs to be reviewed.
Craig
>
> How about that?
>
> On Nov 6, 2009 3:50 PM, "Craig L Russell" <Craig.Russell_at_sun.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009
> at
> 14:36, Craig L Russell <Cr...
> For my money, I'd prefer to see a real Apache release with the real
> copyright notices and licenses that the project intends to ship.
>
> Perhaps make an alpha 1.7 from the trunk? Doesn't even need to work
> perfectly, since the process to make sure a release works is already
> known.
>
> We have required every incubating project for the last few years to
> make a
> release before graduation.
>
> Craig
>
>>>>>> Does that clarify my message? > > Thanks, > -g >
>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge...
>>
> Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
> http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:...
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell_at_sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415311
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on 2009-11-07 03:41:51 CET