[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

From: Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:21:59 -0800

On Nov 6, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Greg Stein wrote:

> But with all that said, how about we do this: we'll do a 1.6.7 release
> from the 1.6.x branch after we do the code import. That release will
> be performed by svncorp (we don't want to touch every file on that
> branch to relicense it, and to switch file headers). The release
> process can be followed/tracked by the Incubator PMC. I'll make sure
> to relay pointers to all relevant threads as the release is performed.
I don't think that releasing svn by svncorp without any Apache license
proves anything except that they can make a release after moving the
repository. So if it makes anyone happy, fine. But it's not an Apache

I'd be interested in seeing a release after it's been licensed to
Apache and has all of the Apache license, notice, and packaging.


Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell_at_sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


  • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on 2009-11-07 01:43:27 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.