[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Next 1.6 release?

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:48:53 +0000

kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> I'd like to be a little selfish and wonder if it would be useful to release a
> 1.6.7 version faster than normal. (Especially since the release schedule
> may be affected by the amount of holiday time near the end of the year.)
> We are really getting hurt by the external problems that were fixed in r40152
> and merged into 1.6.x in r40219. Without this change we can't move a large
> number of our users from 1.5, and I would rather not be forced to compile
> custom patched versions for all the clients we use.
> (command line x 4 platforms, TortoiseSVN, Subclipse)
> Looking at STATUS, there are some other things already nominated (but need
> votes!!!) that also seem useful:
> * Fix for #3432
> * Win 7 exception handler support
> * Fix for #3489
> * Win32 performance improvements
> * future-proof patch
> * Fix for #3519

For those who don't have a numerically-keyed hash of issues in their

* Fix for #3432:
  "Merge can record mergeinfo from natural history gaps"

* Fix for #3489:
  "Filenames with @ cannot be committed to the repository unless an @ is
added at the end."

* future-proof patch
  "Make 1.6.7 (and subsequent Subversion releases) recognize Subversion
1.7+ working copies."

* Fix for #3519:
  "ra_serf using Label header unsupported by mod_dav_svn"

> I don't see it nominated, but the svn+ssh changes for windows may also
> fix some server resource problems others were seeing (We don't use svn+ssh,
> so I can't comment.)
> Is it too soon to be talking about this?

+1 to the general notion of getting a 1.6.7 release out as soon as we
have some useful fixes in it.

- Julian

Received on 2009-11-04 17:49:18 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.