[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r40218 - trunk/subversion/svn

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:09:01 -0400

You don't know when scratch_pool will be cleared, and it is best to keep the
high water mark as low as possible. That means clearing (iter)pools, and it
means putting stuff it the most short-lived pool possible.

On Oct 26, 2009 5:06 PM, "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
wrote:

On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at
04:32, Julian Foad <julia...
But if we already have a scratch_pool, why use the iterpool? *Both* are
going to be cleared Real Soon Now, and using the scratch_pool (over the
iterpool) fits better with our pool usage semantics.

-Hyrum

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2411526
Received on 2009-10-26 22:09:07 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.