On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 05:06:25PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 17:00, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 16:50, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 04:24:55PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> >> >> It looks like the expected output of those tests is proper (if you
> >> >> ignore the "revision 0" to imply a missing left node). I don't
> >> >> understand why your change is reporting "revision 1" for those nodes.
> >> >> They're clearly supposed to be r2 or r3.
> >> >
> >> > So... there might be a bug?
> >>
> >> Seems like, yeah.
> >
> > Should I mark the tests XFail with a comment pointing to this thread,
> > and commit the change?
>
> Euh... why not fix it before committing?
Cause I didn't have much hope of fixing it as I'm barely scratching
WC-NG on the surface. But OK, I'll try fixing it. So it should be r2
or r3, let's see...
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2408734
Received on 2009-10-18 23:33:02 CEST