Feature branches [was: issue-3390-dev branch question]

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > That branch is a "feature branch" in terms of how we should merge to and
> > from it. What this means is that we should from time to time "catch up"
> > with changes that have been made on trunk, by merging all eligible
> > changes from trunk to the branch.
>
> It is not the case that we universally maintain feature branches in this
> fashion, [...]

Oh... is it not? I mean, it's the branch's "parent" branch that we
catch up from, not always trunk, but in what other way do we consciously
maintain a feature branch?

- Julian

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2403778
Received on 2009-10-05 17:59:26 CEST