[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: rpm package without neon

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:49:20 -0400

This question is about the usage of Subversion, and should be sent to users_at_subversion.tigris.org
.

-Hyrum

On Oct 1, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Jeremy Mordkoff wrote:

> Hi –
>
> I support about 20 linux systems. About ½ are still running fedora
> code 7, the other half are fedora core 10. Some users need to be
> able to manage one view from either OS.
>
> We recently upgraded the repository to subversion 1.6 and we are
> rolling out the new client. Since there is no subversion 1.6 binary
> distribution for fedora core 7, I decided to build it myself. I have
> built and tested subversion 1.6.4 on one system. Now I want to roll
> it out to the other 10 fedora core 7 machines. I tried to build an
> RPM file using ‘cd packages/rpm/redhat-8+; make’ but that died
> looking for neon-devel. The packaging system seems to want neon-
> devel but the build seemed happy without it.
>
> Any suggestions? Do I need to download and build neon from source?
>
> Is there a subversion 1.6.4 build for fedora core 7?
>
> JLM
>
>
>
>
> Jeremy Mordkoff
> Director, QA, IT & Release
> ZeeVee, Inc.
> One Monarch Drive | Littleton, MA 01460
> Office: 978.467.1395 x233 | Fax: 978.467.1404
> Mobile: 978-257-2183
> jlm_at_zeevee.com
> www.zeevee.com
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2402529
Received on 2009-10-01 15:49:45 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.