On Sep 30, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:26:01PM -0400, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
>> wrote:
>>> This should be called "svn_wc__node_is_deleted" (past tense).
>>> There is a function with that name in entries.c already.
>>> The existing function expects a wc_db rather than a wc_ctx.
>>> and has a comment saying that it wants to be updated to wc_db.
>>>
>>> Looks like your new function is almost a drop-in replacement.
>>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> libsvn_wc/entries.c:svn_wc__node_is_deleted() is actually asking
>> about
>> the 'deleted' member of svn_wc_entry_t not the 'schedule' member.
>>
>> entry->deleted and entry->schedule == svn_wc_schedule_delete are
>> different beasts:
>>
>> /** The directory containing this entry had a versioned child of
>> this
>> * name, but this entry represents a different revision or a
>> switched
>> * path at which no item exists in the repository. This typically
>> * arises from committing or updating to a deletion of this entry
>> * without committing or updating the parent directory.
>> *
>> * The schedule can be 'normal' or 'add'. */
>> svn_boolean_t deleted;
>>
>> /** scheduling (add, delete, replace ...) */
>> svn_wc_schedule_t schedule;
>
> Oh, right. Thanks for pointing that out.
>
> I guess the functions should contain the word "schedule" then.
>
> What about:
> svn_wc__node_is_schedule_add()
> svn_wc__node_is_schedule_delete()
I caution you put put on your asbestos underwear before Greg gets to
this thread.
The concept of "schedule" is obsolete. Done. Toast. Fini.
I suggest you *strongly* rethink anything re-adding those terms to the
API nomenclature.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2402206
Received on 2009-09-30 20:03:13 CEST