[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Tree conflict bug with switch

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:15:46 -0400

I was sent the following problem description from one of our support
team. I am also attaching a script I wrote which shows it. This
seems like one of those cases where tree conflicts leaves your working
copy in a state where you cannot really do anything. In this case, I
am not sure what we should be doing. I kind of think this should not
be a tree conflict at all and dir1 should just become unversioned and
left on disk as we would have done prior to 1.6.

----- begin paste -------
Steps to reproduce
1) create branchA off trunk
2) add dir1 with 4 files to branchA, commit
3) modify a file(file1.txt) under dir1 on branch A, DONT commit
4) do a switch from branch to trunk

This will result in a tree conflict of dir1, as it does not exist on
trunk. I want this dir so I choose to keep it durring the resolve.

Now I have a directory that is scheduled to be added to trunk, with
files that are still switched to the branch. I cannot commit the
change I made to file1.txt as it will error out.

I can however just commit the 'add' of the new directory, but the
files are still pointing to the branch, in fact I can then commit my
change but it actually commits to the branch, not the trunk.

If I then delete the directory after adding it and update it pulls in
the new directory and all the contents, all pointing to trunk (even
though the files were never added).
----- end paste -------

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2401739

Received on 2009-09-29 20:15:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.