[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.x and r38000

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:11:36 +0100

On Tue, 2009-09-15, Julian Foad wrote:
> Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> > would you be so kind and review your -1 on the r38000 group in 1.6.x? There
> > are a lot of improvements, and I'd give my +1 but am reluctant to push the
> > issue with only elego votes on it.
> >
> > So, even, a +1 from you would be nice, if you find you can award one.
> Hi Neels. Yes, sorry, I've got it flagged and haven't done it yet. I'll
> at least remove my -1 as I can do so quickly but can't review the whole
> thing until at least the day after tomorrow.

I've now reviewed the main parts of 1.6.x-r38000_at_HEAD and am happy. Now
I've "just" got to review the test and repos_diff.c.

Please put your +1 there anyway if you can, or +0 if that's how it is,
and if Stephen can review the latest changes and +1 them we will be
nearly there.

- Julian

Received on 2009-09-25 18:11:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.